Joe Dillard - 02 - In Good Faith Read online

  Table of Contents

  Title Page

  Copyright Page

  Dedication

  PART I

  Wednesday, August 27

  Wednesday, August 27

  Friday, August 29

  Sunday, September 14

  Sunday, September 14

  PART II

  Monday, September 15

  Monday, September 15

  Monday, September 15

  Thursday, September 18

  Thursday, September 18

  Thursday, September 25

  Sunday, September 28

  Sunday, September 28

  Friday, October 3

  Sunday, October 5

  Monday, October 6

  Monday, October 6

  Monday, October 6

  Tuesday, October 7

  Tuesday, October 7

  Wednesday, October 8

  Wednesday, October 8

  Wednesday, October 8

  Tuesday, October 14

  Tuesday, October 14

  Wednesday, October 29

  PART III

  Wednesday, October 29

  Thursday, October 30

  Thursday, October 30

  Friday, October 31

  Friday, October 31

  Saturday, November 1

  Sunday, November 2

  Sunday, November 2

  Sunday, November 2

  Monday, November 3

  Thursday, November 6

  Friday, November 7

  Friday, November 7

  Friday, November 7

  Saturday, November 8

  Sunday, November 9

  Monday, November 10

  Monday, November 10

  Monday, November 10

  Monday, November 10

  Monday, November 10

  PART IV

  Tuesday, November 11

  Tuesday, November 11

  Wednesday, November 12

  Wednesday, November 12

  Six months later … Friday, May 15

  Acknowledgements

  Praise for An Innocent Client

  “Newcomer Scott Pratt brings a fresh voice to a crowded field in his stellar debut, An Innocent Client. Joe Dillard is the best defense lawyer in his small town in Tennessee. He’s also desperately trying to leave the practice of law. Tired of cutting deals for the guilty, Dillard hopes to end his career on a high note—by representing one innocent client. A murder at a local strip club may give him his chance. Artfully plotted, carefully nuanced and immensely readable, An Innocent Client is a terrific debut novel. Joe Dillard is an engaging, complex character who is worth rooting for. We will be hearing much more from Scott Pratt. Highly recommended.”

  —Sheldon Siegel, New York Times bestselling author of Judgment Day

  “A well-crafted, compelling debut, and Scott Pratt is a talent to watch.”

  —Jeff Abbott, national bestselling author of Collision

  “A smart, sophisticated legal thriller. Scott Pratt knows his stuff and it shows.”

  —Alafair Burke, author of Angel’s Tip

  “The most impressive first novel I’ve read in years. Think Harlan Coben meets John Grisham. Scott Pratt has written an unputdownable legal thriller and I can’t wait to see what he does next.”

  —Jason Starr, award-winning author of The Follower

  “I’ve read An Innocent Client and am truly stunned. It’s Scott Turow and Grisham on meth. The opening chapter is maybe the most compelling I’ve read in a decade.”

  —Ken Bruen, Shamus Award-winning author of Cross

  “As polished and engrossing as any John Grisham or John Hart legal thriller, Scott Pratt’s stunning debut novel, An Innocent Client, sings with intrigue, crusty Tennessee characters, and gut-wrenching personal choices. To protagonist Joe Dillard’s wish for ‘just one innocent client,’ I’d say, ‘Watch what you ask for.’ To everyone else, I’d say ‘Go buy this book now.’ ”

  —Louise Ure, Shamus Award-winning author of The Fault Tree

  ALSO BY SCOTT PRATT

  An Innocent Client

  ONYX

  Published by New American Library, a division of

  Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street,

  New York, New York 10014, USA

  Penguin Group (Canada), 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto,

  Ontario M4P 2Y3, Canada (a division of Pearson Penguin Canada Inc.)

  Penguin Books Ltd., 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England

  Penguin Ireland, 25 St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2,

  Ireland (a division of Penguin Books Ltd.)

  Penguin Group (Australia), 250 Camberwell Road, Camberwell, Victoria 3124,

  Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty. Ltd.)

  Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., 11 Community Centre, Panchsheel Park,

  New Delhi - 110 017, India

  Penguin Group (NZ), 67 Apollo Drive, Rosedale, North Shore 0632,

  New Zealand (a division of Pearson New Zealand Ltd.)

  Penguin Books (South Africa) (Pty.) Ltd., 24 Sturdee Avenue,

  Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa

  Penguin Books Ltd., Registered Offices:

  80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL, England

  First published by Onyx, an imprint of New American Library,

  a division of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

  First Printing, June 2009

  Copyright © Scott Pratt, 2009

  All rights reserved

  eISBN : 978-1-101-05271-6

  REGISTERED TRADEMARK—MARCA REGISTRADA

  Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book.

  PUBLISHER’S NOTE

  This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places, and incidents either are the product of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously, and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, business establishments, events, or locales is entirely coincidental.

  The publisher does not have any control over and does not assume any responsibility for author or third-party Web sites or their content.

  The scanning, uploading, and distribution of this book via the Internet or via any other means without the permission of the publisher is illegal and punishable by law. Please purchase only authorized electronic editions, and do not participate in or encourage electronic piracy of copyrighted materials. Your support of the author’s rights is appreciated.

  http://us.penguingroup.com

  In Good Faith is lovingly dedicated

  to my campfire girl.

  PART I

  Wednesday, August 27

  Eight men and four women. A dozen citizens filing slowly past the defense and prosecution tables beneath the stern scrutiny of a white-haired judge. All wore the dazed look of people who’ve been forced to sit for days in a place they’d never been, listen to the words of men and women they’d never seen, and pass judgment on a fellow human being.

  The gallery was sadly bereft of spectators. Misty Bell, a young female newspaper reporter with short chestnut hair and curious hazel eyes, sat dutifully holding her notebook on the front row to my left. Two seats to her right sat the victim’s son, an overweight, sad-looking man in his sixties with sagging jowls and receding gray hair that curled around his ears like smoke from a smoldering cotton ball. Aside from those two and me—I was sitting in the center of the back row—the gallery was empty.

>   The defendant, a wiry man named Billy Dockery, stood next to his lawyer at the defense table as the jury filed past. Dockery was gangly and in his mid-thirties. His dark hair snaked past his shoulders, framing a flat face that had maintained a perpetual smirk throughout the two-day trial. He wore civilized clothing—a dark gray suit, white shirt, and navy blue tie—but I knew he was anything but civilized. Beneath the veneer was a cruel and dangerous sociopath.

  His lawyer was James T. Beaumont III, a longtime practitioner of criminal defense whom I’d known casually for many years. Beaumont was in his late fifties and was somewhat of a celebrity in northeast Tennessee. He favored fringed buckskin jackets and string ties and wore a beige cowboy hat outside the courtroom. A long, light brown mustache and goatee, heavily specked with gray, covered his upper lip and chin. With his longish hair, clear blue eyes, and deep drawl, he reminded me very much of Wild Bill Hickok—at least the way they portrayed him in the movies.

  “Call your witness,” sixty-year-old Judge Leonard Green said.

  Beaumont nodded and stood. “The defense calls Billy Dockery.”

  Dockery got up, ambled to the witness stand, and took the oath, the smirk still on his face. I’d seen the proof in the case and knew Dockery should exercise his Fifth Amendment right to keep his mouth shut. He’d be a terrible witness. But I also knew that Dockery enjoyed the spotlight almost as much as he enjoyed thumbing his nose at the prosecution and torturing defenseless, elderly women.

  After a few preliminary questions, Beaumont got to the point.

  “Mr. Dockery, I’ll ask you this question on the front end. Did you kill Cora Wilson in the early-morning hours of November seventeenth?”

  Dockery leaned closer to the microphone.

  “No, sir, I did not. I did not have anything to do with her death. I was not nowhere near her place that night. I ain’t never hurt nobody and I ain’t never going to.”

  The sound of his voice made me cringe. Five years earlier, Dockery had been charged with murdering another elderly woman during a break-in at her home. His mother hired me to represent him, and after a trial, the jury found him not guilty and set him free. The next day, Dockery walked into my office and drunkenly confessed to me that he’d murdered the woman. He offered me a five-thousand-dollar cash bonus, money he said he’d stolen during the break-in. I threw him out of the office, along with the money, but since double jeopardy prevented them from trying him again, and since the rules of professional responsibility forbade me from telling anyone, I couldn’t do a thing about it. When I read in the newspaper that he was about to go on trial for killing another woman, I wanted to be there to see his face when they sent him to the penitentiary for the rest of his life.

  “Did you know the victim?” Jim Beaumont said from the podium in front of the witness stand.

  “Yes, sir. I done yard work for her sometimes, and I painted her house last year.”

  “Ever have any problems with her?”

  “No, sir. Not nary a one. Me and her got along like two peas in a pod.”

  “Where were you that night, Mr. Dockery?”

  “I was a-campin’ on the Nolichucky River more’n two miles from her house.”

  “In November?”

  “Yes, sir. My mama’s got a cabin down there. It’s got a fireplace and all. I go there a lot.”

  “Anyone with you?”

  “No, sir. I was all by my lonesome.”

  “Thank you, Mr. Dockery. Please answer the prosecutor’s questions.”

  It was the shortest direct examination of a criminal defendant I’d ever seen, and it was smart. Up to that point, the prosecution had been able to establish only that Billy Dockery had done landscaping work for eighty-six-year-old Cora Wilson. They established that Dockery had camped along the Nolichucky River about two miles from Ms. Wilson’s home the night she was beaten and tortured to death, a fact the defense did not dispute. They established that a length of nylon rope found around Ms. Wilson’s neck was the same kind of rope found in the back of Billy Dockery’s truck. The prosecutor’s expert witness could not go so far as to say the rope was an exact match, only that it was made of the same material, of the same weave and circumference, and manufactured by the same company. Unfortunately for the prosecution, the defense subpoenaed an executive from the company that made the rope, and he testified that more than fifty thousand feet of that very same rope had been sold within a twenty-five-mile radius of the courthouse in the past five years.

  The prosecution’s star witness in the case, a seventeen-year-old named Tommy Treadway, had initially confessed to breaking into the house with Dockery that night but refused to sign a statement. Treadway told the police that he left when Dockery began to torture Ms. Wilson. But Treadway was released on bond after he agreed to testify against Dockery and wound up driving his car off the side of a mountain in Carter County a month before the trial. His death was ruled an accident.

  The state’s only other witness—besides the routine information given by the cops and the medical examiner— was a degenerate drunkard named Timmons who said he’d overheard Billy Dockery say that Cora Wilson kept cash in her house and that he “might go get it some night.” Beaumont had already destroyed the witness on cross-examination, forcing him to admit that his two primary activities as an adult had been drinking whiskey and stealing other people’s identities so he could afford to drink more whiskey.

  Now the assistant district attorney had his shot at the defendant. It was usually a prosecutor’s dream, but Assistant District Attorney Alexander Dunn had been aloof and distracted. His case was so weak he should have dismissed it and waited to see whether any more evidence could be developed, but his ego had apparently driven him to trial.

  Dunn, in his early thirties, was wearing a tailored brown suit over a beige shirt. A kerchief rose from the pocket of his jacket, and expensive Italian loafers covered his feet. He stood before Dockery and straightened his silk tie.

  “Isn’t it true, Mr. Dockery, that you and another individual broke into the victim’s home around two a.m. on the morning of November seventeenth?”

  “No.”

  It was an inauspicious beginning, to say the least, and I sank deeper into my seat. Dunn had been ordered by the judge not to mention the dead witness, and the jury was sure to wonder why, if there was a codefendant, he wasn’t on trial at the same time or testifying for the state.

  “And isn’t it true, Mr. Dockery, that you beat and tortured the victim in an effort to force her to tell you where her cash was hidden?”

  “No, it ain’t true, and you ain’t got no fingerprints, no blood, no hair, no witnesses, no nothin’ to prove I was there.”

  “But you did tell Mr. Timmons that the victim kept cash in her home and that you intended to steal it, didn’t you?”

  “I never said no such thing. Timmons ain’t nothing but a drunk and a liar. He was probably just looking for some reward money so he could buy whiskey.”

  “And you’re a model citizen, aren’t you, Mr. Dockery? I’ll bet you don’t even drink.”

  Dockery’s eyes flashed with righteous indignation. He leaned forward and put his hands on the rail in front of him.

  “Yeah, I may drink a little, but I’ll tell you what I don’t do. I don’t parade around in a fancy suit and put people on trial for murder when I ain’t got a smidgen of proof.”

  “I object, Your Honor,” Dunn said. “The witness is being argumentative.”

  “You walked right into it, Mr. Dunn,” Judge Green said. “Move along.”

  “Isn’t it true, Mr. Dockery, that you took thousands of dollars in cash from the victim’s home the night you murdered her?”

  “If I did, then where is it? Y’all tore my mama’s place, her cabin, our barn, and every vehicle we own apart looking for money and didn’t find a thing. And you know why you didn’t find nothing? ’Cause I didn’t do nothing.”

  Alexander Dunn’s cross-examination was a monumental disaster. It ended s
hortly thereafter. Jim Beaumont rested his case, and Judge Green read the instructions to the jury.

  The judge was long rumored in the legal community to be a closet homosexual, and he lorded it over his courtroom like an English nobleman. Before I stopped practicing law, I’d appeared before Green hundreds of times, and although I hadn’t laid eyes on him in a year, each grandiose gesture he made, each perfectly formed syllable he spoke, reminded me of what a pompous ass he was. During lulls in the trial, I found myself imagining him prancing around the room in a white periwig, pink tutu, and tights, leaping through the air like a fabulously gay ballet dancer.

  As soon as Green finished, the jury retired to deliberate. I thought I’d be in for a long wait, but in less than thirty minutes, I saw the bailiffs and clerks bustling around, a sure sign the jurors had made their decision.

  Five minutes later, they filed back into the courtroom. Green turned his palm upward and raised his right hand as though he were a symphony conductor coaxing a crescendo from the woodwinds. The foreman rose, an uncertain look on his weathered face.

  “I understand you’ve reached a verdict,” the judge said.

  “We have, Your Honor.”

  “Pass it to the bailiff.”

  A uniformed deputy crossed the courtroom to the jury box, took the folded piece of paper from the foreman’s hand, and delivered it to Judge Green. The judge dramatically unfolded the paper, looked at it with raised brows, refolded it, and handed it to the bailiff. The bailiff then walked the form back across the room to the foreman.

  “Mr. Foreman,” the judge said, “on the first count of the indictment, premeditated first-degree murder, how does the jury find?”

  “We find the defendant not guilty.”

  “On the second count of the indictment, especially aggravated kidnapping, how does the jury find?”

  “We find the defendant not guilty.”

  “On the third count of the indictment, aggravated burglary, how does the jury find?”